Clinton: The US “Did Not Lose a Single Person” in Libya

Clinton: The US “Did Not Lose a Single Person” in Libya

1962
1
SHARE

Hillary Clinton is proving, yet again, that she doesn’t care about the truth or human lives.

During a town hall meeting in Illinois, Democrat Hillary Clinton said the United States “didn’t lose a single person.” The claim was made in to justify the NATO invasion in 2011 following the adoption of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973.



 



“Now, is Libya perfect? It isn’t,” Clinton said. “Libya was a different kind of calculation and we didn’t lose a single person We didn’t have a problem in supporting our European and Arab allies in working with NATO.”

She seeming forgot about the attack on 9/1//2012 in Benghanzi, which lead to the death US ambassador Christopher Stevens, CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty, as well as Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith.

The snide omission is in keeping with Clinton’s response to a demonstration held at the mission and the subsequent attack and murders. “What difference at this point does it make?” she asked the Senate Foreign Relations Committee after pressed by Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin on her role in the incident.

Christopher Stevens, who died in the attack, was working with the Turks in an arms transfer from Libya to Syrian at the time of the attack. The State Department’s Special Mission Compound in Benghazi was the center of that secret activity.

In 2011 Stevens was appointed by the Obama administration as the chief liaison with the Libyan rebels, who were interchangeable with al-Qaeda. Proof of that comes from the State Department and Stevens working directly with Abdelhakin Belhadh of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. Who has direct connections with al-Qaeda? You guessed it, Belhadh.

Moreover, Clinton also chose to ignore the death of over 10,000 Libyans as well as the murder of Libyan leader Muamaar Gaddafi. Hillary was so overwhelmed with glee in her role in the leaders death – which she take credit for – that she was filmed stating “We came, we saw, he died.”

 



Naji Barakat, the Health Minister of the National Transitional Council in Libya, said the death toll amounted to 30,000 according to figures taken from hospitals, local officials and former rebel commanders.

The media justified the attack. They claimed that NATO, the United States, and its partners were implementing United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 to impose “an immediate ceasefire in Libya, including an end to the current attacks against civilians,” which the globalist organization said ”constitute crimes against humanity.”

In actuality, this was not the case. On April 2, 2011 Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sent an email  which revealed the actual objective- to ensure the strength of the petrol dollar.

Gaddafi was planning to establish a pan-African currency that was back by Libya’s gold Dinar.

According to document posted on the US State Department website advisors to Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, the second son of Muammar Gaddafi, told sources the Libyan government held 143 tons of gold and a similar amount in silver valued at more than $7 billion. The gold and silver was to be used to establish an alternative currency to the French franc for African Francophone countries.

“French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began,” the email states, “and this was one of the factors that influenced President Nicolas Sarkozy’s decision to commit France to the attack on Libya.”

Libya had a plan to no longer sell oil in US dollars, which would put the financiers of the war machine at risk. Gaddafi was also urging other African and Middle Eastern countries to do the same. The truth is, neither Hillary nor the US state department gave a damn about peace in Libya. The fact that Hillary is refusing to even acknowledge the massive loss of life in Libya is even more proof.

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY