Within the United States, most people believe that the reason our schools are failing is that schools are underfunded. They believe what the media and teachers have been peddling for years, “teachers are overworked and underpaid.” But is that true? Is school performance directly correlated with per student spending?
Trying to track down the real cost
A difficult aspect of answering this question is that public school officials constantly lie about how much money they’re getting in. In a study done by the Cato Institute, it was found that some school districts underrepresented the amount spent on students by as much as 90 percent.
That same discrepancy was found in every other state checked. Here are just a few examples:
The assumption is that schools need to spend this amount of money, because it costs a lot to educate children. I mean, private schools are just as expensive, right?
As Stephen Fry put it, “the short answer to your question is “no”. The long answer to your question is “f*ck no”.
The average cost for a private elementary school student is $7,700 dollars, while the average public school cost is $25,000 dollars per student.
What about kids with special needs?
Yet another assumption is that children with special needs cannot be helped in private schools as much as they are in public schools. A fantastic write up regarding an experiment in Florida works to disprove this claim.
“Consider Florida’s McKay Scholarship program, which allows parents to pull their special-needs children out of the public schools and place them in private schools of their choosing. Parental satisfaction with McKay is stratospheric, the program serves twice as many children with disabilities as the D.C. public schools do, and the average scholarship offered in 2006-’07 was just $7,206. The biggest scholarship awarded was $21,907 — still less than the average per-pupil spending in D.C. public schools.”
More money does not equal better results
Take a look at the graphs above, and now tell me that the reason schools are doing badly is because of a lack of funding.
The achievement data come from the Department of Education’s own National Assessment of Educational Progress “Long Term Trends” series, which regularly tests nationally representative samples of U.S. students, drawing from the same pool of questions in use since the tests were first administered around 1970. These are the best data we have on what our kids know by the end of high school and how much it has cost to get them there.
For just one last graph, let’s take a look at how public school children – with their vast amount of specialized teachers – do against home educated children.
So schools are lying about how much they spend, the spending has no correlation with positive outcomes, and public school students do much worse than home educated students on all subjects. Still think we need to increase funding for public education?
If you’re thinking of getting your child out of public school, or simply need a little help with your homeschooling/unschooling curriculum, consider checking out the Ron Paul Homeschool Curriculum.